Skip to main content

Governance Module

The governance module enables decentralized decision-making by allowing token holders to vote on proposals that influence the strategic and operational direction of a project. Integrated within the Engage platform, it provides a structured and transparent mechanism to facilitate protocol evolution, parameter updates, treasury actions, and other community-driven changes.

Governance functionality relies on token-weighted voting, with voting power determined through a snapshot mechanism. This approach captures token balances at a specific block height to ensure fairness and prevent manipulation. Proposals include detailed metadata such as voting thresholds, durations, and quorum requirements, allowing for consistent and auditable decision-making processes.

Designed for flexibility, the governance module is compatible with any ERC-20 governance-enabled token. It can be integrated across a wide range of DeFi, DAO, or real-world asset ecosystems where decentralized coordination is essential.

An example instance of the governance interface is available at the Engage Platform Demo, which illustrates real-time voting, proposal tracking, and snapshot-based logic in action.

Core Functionality

Governance proposals lists

  • Submit proposals for new initiatives or upgrades.
  • Vote on proposals using token weight.
  • View voting history and proposal details.
  • Snapshot-based system to calculate voting power.

How Governance Works

  1. Proposal Creation – Community or admin users submit proposals with descriptions, thresholds, and timelines.
  2. Voting Period – Token holders vote during the open window.
  3. Snapshot Date – Determines voting power based on wallet holdings.
  4. Result Tally – After the end date, results are finalized.

Voting Metadata

  • Title – Summary of the proposal topic
  • Description – Full explanation, criteria, and rationale
  • Snapshot Date – Timestamp when wallet balances are captured
  • End Date – Last day to cast votes

Example Proposal Detail

Governance proposal detail

This example displays a rejected proposal that aimed to modify staking rates. The metadata section includes:

  • Start & End Dates
  • Voting Outcome & Stake Power
  • On-chain Discussion Link
  • Wallet Voting Breakdown

Follow us:

Copyright © 2025 Defactor. All Rights Reserved